Evidence Policy

Our approach to architectural evidence

Part Riddle Garden is an independent guide for culturally curious readers. We treat temples, shrines and palaces as places with histories and communities, not as puzzles to be solved.

Three labels we use

Documented

Supported by period sources

Inscriptions, building manuals, dated records, living ritual practice and measured surveys. Example: the 20-year rebuilding cycle at Ise Jingu.

Debated

Scholarly uncertainty

Published arguments that specialists still contest, such as cosmological measurements at Angkor Wat.

Proposed

Modern pattern-spotting

Analogies and overlays, from fractals to golden rectangles, that lack period evidence.

Sandstone relief of dancing apsaras at Angkor Wat, lit by low raking light that reveals carving depth
Raking light reveals carving depth and later repairs, the kind of physical evidence we prioritise.

How we research

We begin with a visible detail and its exact position on a building. We then check the site's construction and restoration history, the relevant texts or inscriptions, and peer-reviewed scholarship. Where possible we rely on UNESCO nomination files, national heritage agency publications and established translations of primary sources.

Respect for living sites

Most places we write about are active places of worship. We avoid language that makes them exotic or "mysterious" for effect, and we encourage readers to follow dress codes, photography rules and the guidance of caretakers and worshippers.

Corrections and independence

We correct errors openly and date each change. We are not affiliated with any heritage authority, temple, tourism board or government body, and we accept no payment for coverage. Send corrections to [email protected] or use our detail form.

Who we are

Part Riddle Garden is published by Part Riddle Garden Media Pte. Ltd. in Singapore by a small editorial team with backgrounds in architectural history, heritage photography and museum education.